Advertisement
A large drilling rig sits on BLM land outside Parachute. The wells created by the rig will produce commercially viable natural gas for Williams. The Pilot & Today’s five-part series “Power Play” examines the past, present and future of energy. Photo by Brian Ray
Scott Stanford
Scott Stanford's From the Editor column appears Thursdays in Steamboat Today. He also maintains a Blog about the newspaper.
Contact Scott at 871-4221 or e-mail sstanford@steamboatpilot.com
Steamboat Springs Mike Lawrence’s first article in our Power Play series was more than 2,000 words. But it was the following paragraph that got my attention:
“This year, (geologist Vince) Matthews added, China will begin importing coal to support its rate of one new coal-fired plant coming on-line every three days.”
Repeat after me — one new coal-fired power plant every three days. EVERY THREE DAYS. Without the air-pollution regulations in place in the U.S.
It’s a stat that puts into perspective all the talk about moving to renewables. Ride your bike to work, reduce your electricity usage, cut your water consumption and check that box on your power bill that allows you to support wind power. While you’re at it, you might as well pour a glass of water in the Yampa (or the Pacific, for that matter).
For me, that’s the essence of Power Play, the five-part series we launched last Friday and continues every Friday through Aug. 17 in the Steamboat Today. Lawrence, photographer Brian Ray, copy editor Mike Hart and news editor Meg Wortman have invested months in putting this series together.
This is not a series about the environment, and it’s not a celebration of the energy industry. It’s a series that underscores the reality of how we get our energy, including how critically important energy extraction and production is to current and future economies of Northwest Colorado.
In 2004, Colorado residents overwhelmingly approved Amendment 37, which requires the state’s utilities to get 10 percent of their energy from renewable resources by 2015. Legislation passed this year raises those standards. Politicians at every level — particularly Gov. Bill Ritter and Sen. Ken Salazar — have expended significant political capital pushing for increased use of alternative energy resources. Wind farm openings have been highly celebrated, as has ethanol use. Industries, including several ski areas, are touting their use of “energy credits” to power their lifts.
Yet, what Power Play shows is that much of the aforementioned is nothing more than window dressing. Whatever Xcel is putting into wind energy pales in comparison to the company’s investment in coal, which is the past, present and future of power production in this state.
Hey, at least our coal burns cleaner than China’s. It says something that at Storm Peak Laboratory atop Mount Werner, many of the particles they have found in the clouds can be traced to coal-fired power plants in China. Scary.
And while the power folks are bullish on the future of coal, their optimism seems tepid compared to those in the oil and gas business. In installment two of the series Friday, Lawrence and Ray take you to Garfield County, where the fuel in the ground is paying for swimming pools, luring new stores and residents, and pushing home prices ever northward. The Piceance Basin covers 6,000 square miles, including much of Western Colorado, and there is enough natural gas there to fuel energy production for 100 years. It will only take tens of thousands of wells.
Oh yeah — did you know that just underneath the swath of land between Hayden and Steamboat is a rich oil field that new technologies have made ripe for drilling?
The reality of this series is that, for all the chatter about global warming and the need to do something different, the energy industry is growing by putting most of its money where it always has — into coal, into oil and into gas. The big three have never been bigger, and for better or worse, Northwest Colorado is smack dab in the center of it all.
I’m proud of the work our staff has done on this series, and I hope you enjoy it during the next few weeks. If you miss a Friday, you can read the entire series at steamboatpilot.com or in a special section that will publish in the Pilot & Today on Sunday, Aug. 26.
As always, your feedback on the series is welcome.
Scott Stanford’s From the Editor column appears Thursdays in Steamboat Today. Visit his Blog at steamboatpilot.com/stanford, call him at 871-4221 or e-mail editor@steamboatpilot.com
Election 2008
RSS
Community comments
Note: The Steamboat Pilot & Today doesn’t necessarily condone the comments here, nor does it review every post. Read our full policy.
id04sp (anonymous)
July 26, 2007 at 11:16 a.m.
› Suggest removal
Scottie: “I'm givin' her all she's got, Cap'n.”
Oil and gas exploration in our part of the world will provide jobs and housing develpment for the working man. Some of it will be close enough to fill the needs of Steamboat's “working class.”
Renewable energy is a pipe dream without stopping population growth. It's not a choice of saving the environment or giving up driving. It's a choice of letting people starve to death, die of disease, etc., rather than providing for their basic needs. Every person on the planet requires energy to live, from a naked savage who cooks over an open fire to a newspaper editor who has heat in his office during the winter.
Science and engineering are the keys to more efficient use of energy. Who's doing something about letting people breed like rats and absorb the savings every time we come up with something new? Nobody. It's human nature. Comfort and convenience will always win out over stewardship (look it up).
Nothing short of a mass extinction in our lifetime is going to change energy use, and hey, a mass extinction event won't be good for “the environment” either.
Everybody is sitting around waiting for the government to save us. Ain't gonna happen. The people who think they govern us are not smart enough to solve the problems. They're not ethical enough to report the true science, because to do so would impact their funding (like certain government research agencies which shall remain nameless lest I be banned once again).
People in the United States lived quite well in a mostly agrarian society up until World War II. A true worker's paradise would be nuclear families working the land and providing for their own needs, but this time, assisted by the use of solar and wind energy combined with low-current electrical devices that can make a central power grid obsolete over vast areas of the country. The only problem with this “environment saving” idea is that a lot of people who sit in an office and dirty up paper for a living would have to go out and bend over to plant and harvest their food instead of ordering from Dominos while watching pay-per-view.
It would be great if nobody could afford to ski anymore. That would save a lot of energy, and really cut down on the traffic.
So be careful what you ask for. We can save the environment, but you'd better be prepared to replace carbon-based BTUs with your own metabolic output, and be happy with a lifespan of 50 years. That's the price.
Post a comment (Requires free registration)
Posting comments requires a free account and verification.