Comments by yampaman

Page 1 of 1

On Council does Steamboat 700 research (anonymous)
May 12, 2008 at 11:30 a.m.
Suggest removal

Good for Council……we don't have all the answers up here so it makes sense to travel afield to see how others have done it. I hope they don't think that they're going to the Front Range to compare apples to apples to apples with West Steamboat…..I've been to both Denver's Lowry and Stapleton when visiting flatlander relatives and both of them (unlike West Steamboat) are flatter than Kansas…..which makes sense because they were both closed airports…..and since the property was owned by the United States Air Force and the city of Denver respectively, the could call all the shots on development agreements with the developers…..and heck, they could set the terms and pick the developer themselves…..I'm not aware that the City of Steamboat Springs has the same absolute authority here

On Former councilman Brenner moves closer to state Senate run (anonymous)
November 19, 2007 at 11:49 a.m.
Suggest removal

Now who is Cheryl Witt going to back in this one?

On Steve Lewis: New forum needed (anonymous)
October 28, 2007 at 2:02 p.m.
Suggest removal

I don't fully understand…According to this story, the Pilot chose not to print 3 letters that were signed with the authors' names in full view. And in frustration, the authors moved to form a political committee and print the same content of their letters (we are to presume) as display ads but without listing their names at the bottom? And they chose to form that political committee with an out-of-town vacation property owner's name as the contact instead of their own, to further mask their identities that they would have gladly displayed in a letter to the editor? Doesn't add up. I do agree with SL's last remark: it is a matter of where our city council wants to take us. But it is also a matter of how our city council wants to lead us there: in a collaborative and open-minded fashion, or in the fashion of this current council that has, at times, been thoughtful but has also shown varying levels of intellectual arrogance, paralysis by analysis and micromanaging tendencies, and even outright hostility to each other and other thoughtful members of this community.

On Ad treasurer speaks out (anonymous)
October 26, 2007 at 11:40 a.m.
Suggest removal

What is the difference between someone posting “Support So-and-So for Whatever because our current So-and-So is an incompetent whatever” on an anonymous post here compared to an anonymous person/group buying an ad in the paper saying the exact same thing?”
Kielbasa-: very good question, but ask Lewis or Witt. There must be a difference because they could have made their points anonymously here instead of the cost and bureacracy or creating a political committee and paying hundreds or thousands of dollars for the newspaper ads. Perhaps it has something to do with the size of audience of the newspaper, and the “legitimacy” of newspaper advertisements vs. the nature of blogs as somewhat illegimate on-line scribbling.

On Ad treasurer speaks out (anonymous)
October 26, 2007 at 11 a.m.
Suggest removal

ptaylor: allow me to take a crack at your question. . .

Political campaigns—whether it is for US Senate and President or county commissioner or town trustee—are required by law to report how their campaign activities are being funded. Full and immediate disclosure is generally the best way to help voters monitor the influence of campaign money and vote with full knowledge of who is “paying for” and “endorsing” a political message (such as a newspaper advertisement).
The political committee headed by Cheryl Witt of Westminster, Steve Lewis and others was formed to promote the election of incumbent government officials and defeat their opponents. By “knowing who they are,” as you put it, we can weigh the information that's presented in the ad (the message) with who is putting the information out there (the messenger). In politics, the messenger is always as important as the message itself, if not more important. (I would also argue that placing campaign display ads in this one-newspaper town requires a higher standard of transparency than these blog postings, but that's a discussion for a different time.)

In forming this secretive campaign committee, our community has been provided with scant information on the messengers, other than they include a Front Range resident who owns and rents out a vacation home condo at the base area and probably is not eligible to even vote in this City Council election. Steve Lewis came forward as the committee's”spokesman,” but did so tardily and awkwardly and with an apparent ax to grind. Voters should consider this: if the Cheryl Witt/Steve Lewis attack ads are based on truth and verifiable fact, then why use a secretive political committee to deliver the message with ad in the newspaper? There are many ways to support candidates you AGREE with and want to see elected or re-elected: talk to your neighbors, make phone calls, send out letters of support, even make a campaign contribution (which your candidate must dutifully report on his or her campaign finance reports). That takes integrity. To get involved this way, through a cloak-and-dagger committee that pays for hatchet-job newspaper ads, is nothing more than cowardice. And they know that because that's why they hid in the first place, and recruited Cheryl Witt to sign the papers because they wanted to distance themselves from their words. And that's why our community deserves to know who is involved in this group.

On Campaign contributions (anonymous)
October 24, 2007 at 12:06 p.m.
Suggest removal

Who is Cheryl A. Witt of Westminster?

On Campaign practices questioned (anonymous)
October 24, 2007 at 12:05 p.m.
Suggest removal

Who is Cheryl A Witt of Westminster?

Page 1 of 1

Explore Steamboat

Find local businesses:

Advertisement

Happenings

Today's events

Search events

Advertisement

Advertisement